From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pinkney

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 17, 2017
500 Mich. 990 (Mich. 2017)

Opinion

SC: 154374 COA: 325856

05-17-2017

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Edward PINKNEY, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether the trial court abused its discretion when it admitted evidence under MRE 404(b) that related to the defendant’s political and community activities other than the mayoral recall effort for the purpose of showing the defendant’s motive to commit the instant crimes, and (2) whether the Court of Appeals erred in determining that MCL 168.937 creates the substantive offense of election forgery and is not merely a penalty provision for the specific forgery offenses set forth in other provisions of the Michigan election law. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.


Summaries of

People v. Pinkney

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 17, 2017
500 Mich. 990 (Mich. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Pinkney

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Edward PINKNEY…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: May 17, 2017

Citations

500 Mich. 990 (Mich. 2017)
500 Mich. 990

Citing Cases

People v. Pinkney

crimes, and (2) whether the Court of Appeals erred in determining that MCL 168.937 creates the substantive…