From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pineda-Marrero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 2001
283 A.D.2d 178 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

May 1, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Fried, J.), rendered September 30, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 5 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Priscilla Steward, for Respondent.

Noah Lipman, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Nardelli, Tom, Wallach, Saxe, JJ.


Defendant failed to preserve his challenge to the court's instruction that the jury had the option of terminating a requested readback of testimony by signaling, through the foreperson, that it had heard the desired testimony, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the procedure followed by the court was a proper exercise of discretion (see, People v. Chavez, A.D.2d [Feb 13, 2001], 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1547).

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Pineda-Marrero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 2001
283 A.D.2d 178 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Pineda-Marrero

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT v. JOSE PINEDA-MARRERO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 2001

Citations

283 A.D.2d 178 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
724 N.Y.S.2d 593

Citing Cases

People v. Rivera

When, at the foreperson's signal, the court terminated the readback at issue on appeal, the court…