From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pinder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1984
106 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

December 3, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

The supplemental instructions delivered by the Trial Judge after the jury indicated that it was deadlocked were "essentially neutral" and did not serve to coerce the jurors to reach a certain verdict or any verdict (see People v. Page, 47 N.Y.2d 968, 970, cert den 444 U.S. 936; People v. Pagan, 45 N.Y.2d 725; cf. People v. Robinson, 84 A.D.2d 732).

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved or lacking in merit. Thompson, J.P., O'Connor, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Pinder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1984
106 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Pinder

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ARMANDO WAITH PINDER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 3, 1984

Citations

106 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Lilley

In any event, the defendant's challenge is without merit. Contrary to the defendant's position, the Allen…

People v. Curtin

Finally, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court's denial of defendant's mistrial motion, which was…