From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pimpleton

Michigan Court of Appeals
Dec 9, 1971
194 N.W.2d 714 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

Docket No. 11595.

Decided December 9, 1971.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, James K. Miller, Prosecuting Attorney, and Donald A. Johnston, III, Chief Appellate Attorney, for the people.

Arthur J. Tarnow, State Appellate Defender, and Martin Reisig, Assistant Defender, for defendant.

Before: BRONSON, P.J., and QUINN and DANHOF, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION. Defendant pleaded guilty to attempted larceny in a building and he appeals. A motion to affirm has been filed by the people.

Upon an examination of the briefs and record, it is manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Motion to affirm is granted.


Summaries of

People v. Pimpleton

Michigan Court of Appeals
Dec 9, 1971
194 N.W.2d 714 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

People v. Pimpleton

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. PIMPLETON

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 9, 1971

Citations

194 N.W.2d 714 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
37 Mich. App. 439