Opinion
Crim. No. 438.
June 27, 1918.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order denying a new trial. D. M. Young, Judge.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
B. M. Bainbridge, for Appellant.
U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Chas. Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.
The defendant was convicted of robbery, and from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial he brings this appeal.
No appearance in his behalf has been made in this court and we have been furnished with no statement of any reason for disturbing the verdict found against the defendant.
Of course, the presumption is that no prejudicial error was committed and that the verdict is amply supported. We may add that we have sufficiently examined the record to be convinced that the defendant was justly convicted.
The judgment and order are affirmed.