From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Piersig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
May 16, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 3893 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

4011 607/15

05-16-2017

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Chad Piersig, Defendant-Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Arthur H. Hopkirk of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Arthur H. Hopkirk of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Melissa Jackson, J.), rendered October 27, 2015,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

ENTERED: MAY 16, 2017

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.


Summaries of

People v. Piersig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
May 16, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 3893 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Piersig

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Chad Piersig…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: May 16, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 3893 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)