From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pierre

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 10, 2016
142 A.D.3d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

08-10-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Leslie PIERRE, appellant.

Michael A. Ciaffa, Uniondale, NY, for appellant. Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Cristin N. Connell, Cody B. Sibell, and John B. Latella of counsel), for respondent.


Michael A. Ciaffa, Uniondale, NY, for appellant.

Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Cristin N. Connell, Cody B. Sibell, and John B. Latella of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Delligatti, J.), rendered September 12, 2014, convicting him of rape in the second degree (eight counts) and criminal sexual act in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and his statements to law enforcement officials.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Brown, 122 A.D.3d 133, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297 ) and, thus, does not preclude review of his contentions. We reject the defendant's contention that there was no probable cause for his arrest because the police did not substantiate the victim's age. The police were entitled to rely on the victim's unrebutted statement to them that she was 14 years old (see Matter of Culligan's Pub v. New York State Liq. Auth., 170 A.D.2d 506, 565 N.Y.S.2d 851 ).

Furthermore, there is no merit to the defendant's contention that his statement to the police should have been suppressed on the ground that part of it was fabricated by the police (People v. Washington, 51 N.Y.2d 214, 221–222, 433 N.Y.S.2d 745, 413 N.E.2d 1159 ).

MASTRO, J.P., COHEN, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Pierre

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 10, 2016
142 A.D.3d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Pierre

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Leslie PIERRE, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 10, 2016

Citations

142 A.D.3d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
36 N.Y.S.3d 400
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 5769

Citing Cases

People v. Leibert

Nor did the court err in permitting a detective to testify, on rebuttal, to a prior inconsistent statement…

People v. Leibert

decide" (People v Washington, 51 N.Y.2d 214, 221-222 [1980]; see also People v Pierre, 142 A.D.3d 566, 567…