From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Picciotti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 13, 1957
4 A.D.2d 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Opinion

November 13, 1957

Appeal from the Monroe County Court.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Vaughan, Kimball, Williams and Goldman, JJ.


Order dated April 30, 1956, insofar as it denies the application for a hearing reversed on the law and facts and otherwise order affirmed, and matter remitted to the Monroe County Court for a hearing on the issues. Appeal from order dated November 9, 1956, dismissed as academic. Memorandum: The moving papers set up claims of fraud, deceit and coercion in connection with the defendant's plea of guilty and conviction. In answer, the District Attorney has produced a transcript of the court proceedings upon arraignment, plea and sentence. While this transcript puts in issue the claims of the relator, these claims are not "conclusively refuted by unquestionable documentary proof". ( People v. Richetti, 302 N.Y. 290, 296.) Relator is therefore entitled to a hearing. ( People v. Robson, 285 App. Div. 111 2.) All concur, except Vaughan and Goldman, JJ., who dissent as to the reversal and vote for affirmance of the orders appealed from.


Summaries of

People v. Picciotti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 13, 1957
4 A.D.2d 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)
Case details for

People v. Picciotti

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDMUND V. PICCIOTTI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1957

Citations

4 A.D.2d 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Citing Cases

People v. Hughes

Therefore, the only question presented is whether defendant is entitled to a hearing upon the facts alleged…

People v. Graves

Under these circumstances, there should be a hearing at which the defendant will be entitled to be…