From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Piazza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 27, 1995
214 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 27, 1995

Appeal from the County Court of Sullivan County (Kane, J.).


Defendant's principal argument on appeal is a challenge to the sufficiency of his plea allocution, an argument he failed to preserve by moving to either vacate or withdraw his plea (see, People v Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665). Additionally, at the time he pleaded guilty, defendant also waived his right to appeal (see, People v Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1). Inasmuch as we are satisfied from a review of the record that the waiver of appeal was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made, the judgment of conviction must be affirmed.

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Piazza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 27, 1995
214 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Piazza

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANK PIAZZA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 27, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
625 N.Y.S.2d 953

Citing Cases

People v. Perez

This appeal followed. Initially, we find that insofar as defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea or…