From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Philyaw

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 19, 2023
212 A.D.3d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

17122 Ind. No. 2622/17 Case No. 2018–04363

01-19-2023

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Najre PHILYAW, Defendant–Appellant.

Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Natalie Rea of counsel), for appellant. Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Emily N. Gault of counsel), for respondent.


Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Natalie Rea of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Emily N. Gault of counsel), for respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Webber, Moulton, Gonza´lez, Rodriguez, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Cassandra M. Mullen, J.), rendered December 13, 2018, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and sentencing him to a term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The court meaningfully responded to a jury note by rereading the elements of the crime and reminding the jury to avoid speculation and render a verdict based solely upon the evidence (see People v. Steinberg, 79 N.Y.2d 673, 684, 584 N.Y.S.2d 770, 595 N.E.2d 845 [1992] ; People v. Malloy, 55 N.Y.2d 296, 301, 449 N.Y.S.2d 168, 434 N.E.2d 237 [1982], cert denied 459 U.S. 847, 103 S.Ct. 104, 74 L.Ed.2d 93 [1982] ). The additional instruction tracked the applicable Penal Law provisions and was sufficient to address the concern that the note appeared to be raising as to the intent element of criminal possession of stolen property (see People v. Lewis, 5 N.Y.3d 546, 551, 807 N.Y.S.2d 1, 840 N.E.2d 1014 [2005] ). Nor has defendant demonstrated that he was prejudiced by any claimed error in the court's response (see People v. Lourido, 70 N.Y.2d 428, 435, 522 N.Y.S.2d 98, 516 N.E.2d 1212 [1987] ). The court informed the jury that it could seek additional clarification if rereading the charge was insufficient, and the jury did not send any further notes regarding that charge (see People v. Almodovar, 62 N.Y.2d 126, 132, 476 N.Y.S.2d 95, 464 N.E.2d 463 [1984] ; People v. Stokes, 149 A.D.3d 510, 511, 52 N.Y.S.3d 326 [1st Dept. 2017], lv denied 29 N.Y.3d 1087, 64 N.Y.S.3d 177, 86 N.E.3d 264[2017] ).


Summaries of

People v. Philyaw

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 19, 2023
212 A.D.3d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

People v. Philyaw

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Najre PHILYAW…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 19, 2023

Citations

212 A.D.3d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
212 A.D.3d 513