From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pharr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 10, 1994
204 A.D.2d 126 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 10, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia Anne Williams, J.).


Defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds was properly denied. The 78-day delay attributable to the two arresting officers' subsequent injuries, fully documented by medical records, was properly excluded since the injuries constituted exceptional circumstances under CPL 30.30 (4) (g) (People v. Zirpola, 57 N.Y.2d 706). The due diligence requirement under this section of the CPL does not require the People to present video-taped testimony to the Grand Jury to minimize any delay.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Kupferman, Asch, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Pharr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 10, 1994
204 A.D.2d 126 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Pharr

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEFFREY PHARR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 10, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 126 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 115

Citing Cases

People v. Stanley

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from. The People failed to demonstrate that the…

People v. Shaw

Unavailability of a principal witness for orthopedic injuries can fall within the exclusion of CPL § 30.30…