From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Petro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1981
83 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

July 6, 1981


Appeals by defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered July 30, 1979, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) an order of the same court, dated January 9, 1980, which denied resentencing. The appeal from the judgment brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of defendant's motion to suppress physical evidence (Slavin, J.). Judgment reversed, on the law, motion to suppress physical evidence granted, and matter remitted to Criminal Term for further proceedings. Appeal from the order dismissed as moot in light of our determination on the appeal from the judgment. The People failed to establish at the suppression hearing that there was probable cause for the arrest of the defendant. In a situation such as existed at bar, it was incumbent upon the People to produce, at the suppression hearing, the undercover officer who relayed the information to the arresting officer resulting in the defendant's arrest (see People v. Havelka, 45 N.Y.2d 636, 641; People v. Lypka, 36 N.Y.2d 210; People v. Delgado, 79 A.D.2d 976). As such, the $1 bill seized from defendant at the time of the arrest must be suppressed. Damiani, J.P., Titone, Gibbons and Weinstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Petro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1981
83 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

People v. Petro

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PRISTAL PETRO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1981

Citations

83 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

People v. Waterman

Having challenged the underlying basis for the arrest, the defendant contends that the People cannot…

People v. Petralia

The court noted that "although constrained to follow the Appellate Division decisions" it found difficulty in…