From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Peterkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 14, 2010
77 A.D.3d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 101947.

October 14, 2010.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Drago, J.), rendered June 9, 2008, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the first degree.

David Perino, Albany, for appellant.

Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Gerald A. Dwyer of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spain, J.P., Lahtinen, Stein and Garry, JJ.


In satisfaction of an 11-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to robbery in the first degree, waived his right to appeal and was sentenced as a second felony offender to the agreed-upon term of 13 years in prison followed by five years of post-release supervision. Defendant now appeals, arguing that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and that his sentence was harsh and excessive.

To the extent that defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim impacts the voluntariness of his plea, it survives the waiver of his right to appeal ( see People v Walley, 63 AD3d 1284, 1285; People v Gilmour, 61 AD3d 1122, 1124 , lv denied 12 NY3d 925). Nevertheless, defendant's failure to move to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction renders the matter unpreserved for our review ( see People v Scitz, 67 AD3d 1251, 1251-1252). In any event, defendant's contention that he was pressured into entering the plea is belied by the record. Defendant's remaining assertion that the bargained for sentence is harsh and excessive is foreclosed by his valid appeal waiver ( see People v Jeske, 55 AD3d 1057, 1058, lv denied 11 NY3d 898).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Peterkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 14, 2010
77 A.D.3d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

People v. Peterkin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KAHENE PETERKIN, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 14, 2010

Citations

77 A.D.3d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 7275
908 N.Y.S.2d 614

Citing Cases

People v. Tatum

We affirm. Defendant claims that he received the ineffective assistance of counsel in that he was not advised…

People v. Small

Moreover, the narrow exception to the preservation rule is not implicated here ( see People v Naumowicz, 76…