From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Peterkin

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 9, 2015
134 A.D.3d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

12-09-2015

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Nashane A. PETERKIN, appellant.

Michael A. Fiechter, Bellmore, N.Y., for appellant. Madeline Singas, Acting District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Daniel Bresnahan of counsel; Matthew C. Frankel on the memorandum), for respondent.


Michael A. Fiechter, Bellmore, N.Y., for appellant.

Madeline Singas, Acting District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Daniel Bresnahan of counsel; Matthew C. Frankel on the memorandum), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Delligatti, J.), imposed February 20, 2014, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

ENG, P.J., DILLON, SGROI, HINDS–RADIX and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Peterkin

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 9, 2015
134 A.D.3d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Peterkin

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Nashane A. PETERKIN, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 9, 2015

Citations

134 A.D.3d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 9125
19 N.Y.S.3d 910

Citing Cases

People v. Peterkin

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 2d Dept: 134 AD3d 859 (Nassau)…