Opinion
April 8, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
Defendant's claim regarding the sufficiency of the plea allocution is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05; People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v. De Santis, 108 A.D.2d 821; People v. Mattocks, 100 A.D.2d 944). Moreover, reversal is not warranted in the interest of justice because the record establishes that defendant knowingly and voluntarily pleaded guilty ( see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9; People v. Carrisquello, 106 A.D.2d 513). Nor do we perceive any basis for concluding that the sentence, which was the product of a negotiated plea, requires modification in the interest of justice ( see, People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816; People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Thompson and O'Connor, JJ., concur.