From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Perry

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 26, 2017
56 N.Y.S.3d 464 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

07-26-2017

In the Matter of J.R. (Anonymous). Rockland County Department of Social Services, respondent, v. Paul B. (Anonymous), appellant.

Del Atwell, East Hampton, NY, for appellant. Thomas E. Humbach, County Attorney, Pomona, NY (Barbara M. Wilmit of counsel), for respondent. Jacqueline Sands, New City, NY, attorney for the child.


Del Atwell, East Hampton, NY, for appellant.

Thomas E. Humbach, County Attorney, Pomona, NY (Barbara M. Wilmit of counsel), for respondent.

Jacqueline Sands, New City, NY, attorney for the child.

Appeal by the father from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Rockland County (Sherri L. Eisenpress, J.), dated June 30, 2016. The order, insofar as appealed from, after a dispositional hearing, terminated the father's parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the subject child to the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption. The appeal from the order of disposition brings up for review so much of an order of fact-finding of that court dated March 28, 2016, as, after a fact-finding hearing, found that the father permanently neglected the child.

ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly determined that the Rockland County Department of Social Services established by clear and convincing evidence that, despite its diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parent-child relationship, the father permanently neglected the subject child by failing to plan for the future of the child for a period of at least one year following the child's placement into foster care (see Matter of Selena R.M. [Theresa M.K.], 147 A.D.3d 953, 954, 48 N.Y.S.3d 414 ) and that terminating the father's parental rights and freeing the child for adoption would be in the child's best interests (see Matter of Tanay R.S. [Tanya M.], 147 A.D.3d 858, 860, 47 N.Y.S.3d 360 ; Matter of Malachi P. [Georgette P.], 142 A.D.3d 883, 884, 37 N.Y.S.3d 539 ).The father's remaining contentions are without merit.

AUSTIN, J.P., HINDS–RADIX, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Perry

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 26, 2017
56 N.Y.S.3d 464 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Rahsaan PERRY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 26, 2017

Citations

56 N.Y.S.3d 464 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)