From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Perles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 7, 1958
5 A.D.2d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

April 7, 1958


Appellant was convicted after trial before a City Magistrate sitting as a Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, of violating subdivision 5-a of section 70 Veh. Traf. of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (leaving the scene of an accident without reporting). Appellant was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 or to serve five days, and his license was revoked. The fine was paid. The appeal is from the judgment of conviction and the sentence imposed. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, new trial ordered, and fine remitted. On this record, it was prejudicial error to reject the proffered testimony of appellant's witness, an eight-year-old boy, without conducting a preliminary examination to determine if he was competent to testify (Code Crim. Pro., § 392; Wheeler v. United States, 159 U.S. 523; People v. Klein, 266 N.Y. 188; People v. Tanaglea, 241 App. Div. 823; Olshansky v. Prensky, 185 App. Div. 469; People v. Shlansky, 256 N.Y. 538; People v. Brescia, 283 App. Div. 971; cf. People v. Dropkin, 261 App. Div. 223). No separate appeal lies from the sentence, which has been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Perles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 7, 1958
5 A.D.2d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

People v. Perles

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAMUEL PERLES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 7, 1958

Citations

5 A.D.2d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

Rittenhouse v. Town of North Hempstead

We believe that it was prejudicial error to exclude the testimony of the infant without a preliminary…

Kapuscinski v. Kapuscinski

Pending the new trial and determination, defendant is to pay plaintiff alimony of $20 per week and child…