From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Perkins

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 23, 2020
189 A.D.3d 2158 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

1216 KA 14-00640

12-23-2020

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles R. PERKINS, Defendant-Appellant.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DAVID R. JUERGENS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DAVID R. JUERGENS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, TROUTMAN, BANNISTER, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of murder in the second degree ( Penal Law § 125.25 [1] ) and assault in the first degree (§ 120.10 [1] ). Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury (see People v. Danielson , 9 N.Y.3d 342, 349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ), we reject defendant's contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v. Bleakley , 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 [1987] ). Even assuming, arguendo, that an acquittal would not have been unreasonable, we cannot conclude that the jury failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded (see generally Danielson , 9 N.Y.3d at 348, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 ; Bleakley , 69 N.Y.2d at 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 ). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his further contention that the prosecutor improperly elicited hearsay testimony to establish an alleged motive for defendant shooting the two victims and we decline to exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a] ). We also reject defendant's contention that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Finally, we have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and conclude that none requires reversal or modification of the judgment.


Summaries of

People v. Perkins

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 23, 2020
189 A.D.3d 2158 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Perkins

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles R. PERKINS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 23, 2020

Citations

189 A.D.3d 2158 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
134 N.Y.S.3d 891

Citing Cases

People v. Perkins

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 4th Dept: 189 AD3d 2158 (Monroe)…