From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Perino

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department
Oct 26, 2021
No. 2021-05825 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 26, 2021)

Opinion

2021-05825 Ind. 2809/19

10-26-2021

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Danie Perino, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal No. 14482 Case No. 2020-01539

Caprice R. Jenerson, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Adam Murphy of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Rachel Bond of counsel), for respondent.


Caprice R. Jenerson, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Adam Murphy of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Rachel Bond of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Kern, J.P., Oing, Singh, Mendez, Higgitt, JJ.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered January 10, 2020,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Perino

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department
Oct 26, 2021
No. 2021-05825 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 26, 2021)
Case details for

People v. Perino

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Danie Perino…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department

Date published: Oct 26, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-05825 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 26, 2021)