From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 13, 2000
268 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

January 13, 2000

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Buckley, J.), rendered September 28, 1998, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

Gail B. Rubenfeld, Smallwood, for appellant.

Thomas F. O'Mara, District Attorney, Elmira, for respondent.

Before: MERCURE, J.P., CREW III, PETERS, SPAIN AND CARPINELLO, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Pursuant to a plea bargain, defendant entered a plea of guilty to a reduced charge of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 1+ to 3 years, to be served consecutively to the sentence he was currently serving. We reject defendant's claim that he was improperly sentenced as a second felony offender. Notably, the record indicates that the People filed a CPL 400.21 statement alleging that defendant had previously been convicted within this State of murder in the second degree, which constituted a predicate felony. Defendant, who was represented by counsel, clearly admitted the prior conviction and indicated that he understood that he was pleading guilty to the instant crime as a second felony offender.

Although it was mentioned by defendant and his counsel that defendant had a pending CPL article 440 motion relating to the murder conviction, defendant raised no constitutional or other challenge to County Court's consideration of his prior conviction and, at the time of sentencing, made no objection to being sentenced as a second felony offender (see, People v. Chrysler, 260 A.D.2d 945). Thus, defendant was given sufficient notice of and an opportunity to controvert the allegations made in the second felony offender statement (see, People v. Bouyea, 64 N.Y.2d 1140, 1142) and we find that there was substantial compliance with CPL 400.21 (see, People v. Mann, 258 A.D.2d 738,lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 900; People v. Polanco, 232 A.D.2d 674, 675).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 13, 2000
268 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAMUEL PEREZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 13, 2000

Citations

268 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
701 N.Y.S.2d 493

Citing Cases

People v. Paige

County Court informed defendant, who was represented by counsel, about the prior felony conviction and…

People v. Bachman

We are similarly unpersuaded that defense counsel's failure to challenge the predicate offense amounted to…