From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1987
132 A.D.2d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

July 6, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cohen, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant argues that during his summation the prosecutor improperly vouched for the credibility of a prosecution witness and denigrated the theory of the defense which emphasized the unreliability of this witness's testimony, thus depriving him of a fair trial. He also complains that the prosecutor's remarks improperly inflamed the jury. However, any possible prejudice with respect to these latter remarks was cured by the trial court's curative instruction to the jury and the claimed vouching and denigration by the prosecutor could reasonably be considered fair response to the defense counsel's own scathing and unfounded summation remarks about the complaining witness. In any event, even if the remarks were improper, they were harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt (see, People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230).

We also conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in imposing sentence in view of the defendant's extensive criminal history (see, e.g., People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1987
132 A.D.2d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. OCTAVIO PEREZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1987

Citations

132 A.D.2d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Sumpter

However, the trial court's immediate admonitions and curative instructions both at the outset of and during…

People v. Stith

05; People v. Scotti, 220 A.D.2d 543). In any event, these remarks were either fair response to the defense…