From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 19, 2004
4 A.D.3d 212 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2899.

Decided on February 19, 2004.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Richard Price, J.), rendered June 25, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5½ to 11 years, unanimously affirmed.

David Rong, for Respondent.

Steven J. Miraglia, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Williams, Friedman, Gonzalez, JJ.


Defendant's challenges to the People's summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the challenged remarks generally constituted fair comment on the evidence, and reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, made in response to defense arguments, and that the summation did not shift the burden of proof or deprive defendant of a fair trial ( see People v. Overlee, 236 A.D.2d 133, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 976; People v. D'Alessandro, 184 A.D.2d 114, 118-119, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 884). Contrary to defendant's present assertion, the defense summation was not limited to a claim of mistaken identity, but also included attacks on the officers' credibility, to which the People were entitled to respond.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 19, 2004
4 A.D.3d 212 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT PEREZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 19, 2004

Citations

4 A.D.3d 212 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
772 N.Y.S.2d 50

Citing Cases

People v. Dickerson

Finally, defendant's arguments respecting certain isolated remarks during the prosecutor's summation are not…