From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Perez

California Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Apr 20, 2010
No. F055867 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 20, 2010)

Opinion


THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. EZEKIEL PEREZ, Defendant and Appellant. F055867 California Court of Appeal, Fifth District April 20, 2010

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Super. Ct. No. VCF181605

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

Poochigian, J.

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on March 23, 2010, be modified as follows:

On page 23, the ninth line of the first full paragraph, beginning with the words, “Although this trio … “ is changed to read as follows:

Alejandro Salazar, Flores and V.C. testified that they saw the driver and passenger in the suspect vehicle at the time of the offenses and offered a general description of their features. However, Salazar was unable to select appellant’s picture from a police photographic lineup prior to trial. Moreover, Flores and V.C. were unable to identify appellant at trial. Nevertheless, Salazar did testify at trial that appellant was the driver of the Honda on the day of the offenses.

There is no change in the judgment.

I CONCUR: Gomes, J.


Summaries of

People v. Perez

California Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Apr 20, 2010
No. F055867 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 20, 2010)
Case details for

People v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. EZEKIEL PEREZ, Defendant and…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 20, 2010

Citations

No. F055867 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 20, 2010)