From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Perez

Court of Appeals of New York
Mar 30, 2021
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 1936 (N.Y. 2021)

Opinion

No. 45 SSM 5

03-30-2021

The People & c., Respondent, v. Alex Perez, Appellant.

Submitted by Matthew C. Hug, for appellant. Submitted by Emily Schultz, for respondent.


Submitted by Matthew C. Hug, for appellant.

Submitted by Emily Schultz, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Any error was harmless because, in the circumstances presented, the proof of defendant's guilt was overwhelming, even after excising the disputed evidence. Further, no reasonable possibility exists that admission of that evidence contributed to defendant's conviction (see People v Mairena, 34 NY3d 473, 484-485 [2019]; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 237, 241-242 [1975]). Defendant's arguments concerning the weight of the evidence and the harshness of his sentence are not reviewable, and his other assertions are unavailing.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur.

Decided March 30, 2021


Summaries of

People v. Perez

Court of Appeals of New York
Mar 30, 2021
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 1936 (N.Y. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:The People & c., Respondent, v. Alex Perez, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York

Date published: Mar 30, 2021

Citations

2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 1936 (N.Y. 2021)
36 N.Y.3d 1093
143 N.Y.S.3d 663
167 N.E.3d 919