From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Perez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 10, 2014
116 A.D.3d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-04-10

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Federico PEREZ, Defendant–Appellant.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Adrienne M. Gantt of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Eric C. Washer of counsel), for respondent.



Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Adrienne M. Gantt of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Eric C. Washer of counsel), for respondent.
FRIEDMAN, J.P., MOSKOWITZ, FREEDMAN, GISCHE, CLARK, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Michael A. Gross, J.), rendered December 12, 2011, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of disorderly conduct, and sentencing him to a $100 fine, unanimously affirmed.

Under the particular circumstances of the case, we find that the record establishes defendant's understanding and waiver of his constitutional rights ( see People v. Tyrell, 22 N.Y.3d 359, 366, 981 N.Y.S.2d 336, 4 N.E.3d 346 [2013] ), even though there was no discussion on the record of defendant's rights under Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). “There are, historically, certain minor transgressions which admit of summary disposition” ( People v. Letterio, 16 N.Y.2d 307, 312, 266 N.Y.S.2d 368, 213 N.E.2d 670 (1965), cert. denied384 U.S. 911, 86 S.Ct. 1354, 16 L.Ed.2d 364 (1966).

Defendant pleaded guilty to a violation, with no consequences other than a $100 fine, which he subsequently paid. In defendant's presence, defense counsel acknowledged that defendant agreed to waive “formal allocution.” In response to the court's questioning, defendant personally confirmed that he wanted to plead guilty, and that he made this decision after having enough time to confer with his counsel. Moreover, the record shows that defendant had ample opportunity to review his options in consultation with counsel, including a one-month adjournment to consider the plea offer.

We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining arguments.


Summaries of

People v. Perez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 10, 2014
116 A.D.3d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Federico PEREZ…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 10, 2014

Citations

116 A.D.3d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
116 A.D.3d 511
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2518

Citing Cases

People v. Serrano

The People further contend that Tyrell should not apply in this case because defendant could have moved to…

People v. Sanchez

The record fails to demonstrate that defendant was informed of any of the constitutional rights that he was…