From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 1986
123 A.D.2d 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

October 20, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Balbach, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings.

Criminal Term granted that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress a gun on the ground that the stop of the defendant's vehicle was illegal and therefore tainted the subsequent recovery of the weapon. Under People v Boodle ( 47 N.Y.2d 398, cert denied 444 U.S. 969), however, it was error for the court to suppress the weapon. The defendant's act of walking away from the police officer and dropping the gun behind some bushes was not "a spontaneous reaction to a sudden and unexpected confrontation with the police", but rather "an independent act involving a calculated risk" (People v Boodle, supra, p 404). The seizure of the gun could not have been tainted, therefore, by any illegality in the arrest. Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Bracken and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 1986
123 A.D.2d 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. ALEXANDER PEREZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 20, 1986

Citations

123 A.D.2d 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

State v. Johnson

Martinez-Lopez v.United States, 423 U.S. 934, 96 S.Ct. 290, 46 L.Ed.2d 265 (1975); United States v. Nooks,…

People v. Williams

The hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant's motion which sought to suppress a gun…