From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pena

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 23, 2015
129 A.D.3d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-06-23

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ignacio PENA, Defendant–Appellant.

Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Robert S. Dean of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Julia L. Chariott of counsel), for respondent.



Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Robert S. Dean of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Julia L. Chariott of counsel), for respondent.
MAZZARELLI, J.P., SWEENY, ACOSTA, CLARK, KAPNICK, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alvin Yearwood, J.), rendered March 16, 2012, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second and third degrees, reckless endangerment in the second degree, unlawful fleeing a police officer in a motor vehicle in the third degree, and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of six years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). While an officer was lawfully attempting to remove defendant from a car, defendant drove forward rapidly, with the officer still hanging on to defendant, causing the officer to be dragged and injured. The totality of defendant's conduct throughout the incident supports the conclusion that defendant acted with intent to prevent the officer from performing a lawful duty ( seePenal Law § 120.05[3]; People v. Bueno, 18 N.Y.3d 160, 168–169, 936 N.Y.S.2d 636, 960 N.E.2d 405 [2011] ), and that defendant was not so intoxicated as to be unable to form the requisite intent ( seePenal Law § 15.25; People v. Stillwagon, 101 A.D.3d 1629, 956 N.Y.S.2d 352 [4th Dept.2012], lv. denied 21 N.Y.3d 1020, 971 N.Y.S.2d 502, 994 N.E.2d 398 [2013] ).

Defendant's excessive sentence claim appears to be moot because he has completed his prison term and, as a result of having been deported, he is not serving postrelease supervision. In any event, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.


Summaries of

People v. Pena

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 23, 2015
129 A.D.3d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Pena

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ignacio PENA…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 23, 2015

Citations

129 A.D.3d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
129 A.D.3d 600
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 5423

Citing Cases

People v. Pena

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 1st Dept: 129 AD3d 600 (Bronx)…

People v. Brooks

Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime of assault in the second degree as charged to the…