From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pena

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 8, 1997
242 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 8, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.).


Ordered that the order dated June 12, 1996, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated June 17, 1996, is affirmed.

The police officers properly stopped the defendants in their vehicle to inquire, based upon the complainant's words and conduct indicating that the defendants had attempted to pull or call him over, and based upon a police officer's knowledge of a city-wide pattern of robberies in which civilians had used cars such as that of the defendants, resembling unmarked police vehicles, to pull people over and rob them ( see, People v. De Bour, 40 N.Y.2d 210, 223).

However, the hearing court determined that the officers' testimony that the complainant told a backup officer that he had been the victim of an attempted armed robbery — the predicate for all police action following the initial stop — was not credible. It is well settled that the "resolution of issues of credibility are primarily for the hearing court, which had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses, and its determination should be accorded weight on appeal, and should not be set aside unless clearly unsupported by the record" ( People v. Lam, 226 A.D.2d 554; People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761).

The Supreme Court's finding of lack of credibility on the part of the officers was supported by the record. Thus, while the initial stop was justified, once the computer check on the license of the driver and the registration of the vehicle revealed nothing untoward, "the initial justification for seizing and detaining [the defendants] was exhausted" and the gun seized in the search of the defendants' vehicle, as well as the defendant Roberto Colon's statement made to the police, were properly suppressed ( see, People v. Banks, 85 N.Y.2d 558, 562, cert denied 516 U.S. 868; People v. Milaski, 62 N.Y.2d 147, 156; cf., People v. Safoschnik, 238 A.D.2d 448; see also, Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471; People v. Cox, 61 N.Y.2d 1020).

Copertino, J.P., Thompson, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Pena

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 8, 1997
242 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Pena

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. JUAN PENA, GUILLERMO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 8, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
662 N.Y.S.2d 82

Citing Cases

People v. Ford

The Supreme Court correctly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress…

People v. Figueroa

In reversing the lower court's denial of the branch of the defendant's motion to suppress physical evidence…