From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Peguero

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 25, 2011
88 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-10-25

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,v.Avial PEGUERO, Defendant–Appellant.


Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Martin M. Lucente of counsel), for appellant.Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Marc Weber of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Roger S. Hayes, J.), rendered July 2, 2008, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fourth degrees, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 1 1/2 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it admitted expert testimony concerning circumstances that indicate an intent to sell drugs ( see People v. Hicks, 2 N.Y.3d 750, 778 N.Y.S.2d 745, 811 N.E.2d 7 [2004] ). Defendant did not preserve his claim that the expert improperly opined that defendant was a drug seller, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the testimony was within the scope permitted under Hicks, and that defendant was not prejudiced in any event.

TOM, J.P., SAXE, MOSKOWITZ, DeGRASSE, ABDUS–SALAAM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Peguero

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 25, 2011
88 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Peguero

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,v.Avial PEGUERO…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

88 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7489
931 N.Y.S.2d 496

Citing Cases

People v. Simon

The court properly exercised its discretion when it admitted expert testimony concerning circumstances that…

People v. Peguero

Judge: , J. Decision Reported Below: 1st Dept: 88 AD3d 589 (NY)…