From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Peek

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 16, 1976
358 N.E.2d 266 (N.Y. 1976)

Opinion

Submitted October 12, 1976

Decided November 16, 1976

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, HILDA G. SCHWARTZ, J.

Gerald Zuckerman for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Edward Agnew McDonald and Peter L. Zimroth of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM. Order of the Appellate Division affirmed. The closeness in time (two or three days before the instant offense), the substantial identity of place, and the similarity of the shooting from the same automobile made admissible the prior uncharged offense. Such coincidence of time, place, and pattern of conduct established a sufficient probability to negative the suggested inference that defendant was a victim rather than an aggressor. On this view, the reasoning of the Appellate Division is acceptable. The other issues raised by defendant do not require discussion.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Peek

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 16, 1976
358 N.E.2d 266 (N.Y. 1976)
Case details for

People v. Peek

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONALD PEEK, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 16, 1976

Citations

358 N.E.2d 266 (N.Y. 1976)
358 N.E.2d 266
389 N.Y.S.2d 573

Citing Cases

People v. Salisbury

Memorandum: County Court properly dismissed the indictment charging defendant with assault in the second…