From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Peck

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 11, 1986
502 N.E.2d 991 (N.Y. 1986)

Opinion

Argued October 8, 1986

Decided November 11, 1986

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Jerome Hornblass, J.

Daniel Markewich for appellant. Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Robert M. Horkovich and Donald J. Siewert of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant contends that his statement made to police officers at the scene of a robbery should have been excluded from evidence because the People failed to provide him with timely notice or demonstrate good cause for such failure (CPL 710.30). To the extent that defendant's present contention was preserved for our review, it was waived (CPL 710.30). Defendant's additional argument that his trial attorney was so inadequate as to deny him effective assistance of counsel is without merit.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR., concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Peck

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 11, 1986
502 N.E.2d 991 (N.Y. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Peck

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. OCTAVIO PECK, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 11, 1986

Citations

502 N.E.2d 991 (N.Y. 1986)
502 N.E.2d 991
510 N.Y.S.2d 76

Citing Cases

People v. St. Martine

However, to distinguish People v. O'Doherty (supra), from the present situation simply because, unlike in…