From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Peacock

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District
Jun 26, 1974
313 N.E.2d 470 (Ill. App. Ct. 1974)

Summary

In People v. Peacock (1974), 20 Ill. App.3d 969, 313 N.E.2d 470 (abstract), the defendant argued that the circumstantial evidence failed to prove that he was one of two persons observed during the burglary of a home.

Summary of this case from People v. Hancock

Opinion

No. 73-227 Judgment affirmed.

June 26, 1974. Abstract of Decision

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Lake County; the Hon. HARRY D. STROUSE, JR., Judge, presiding.

George Pease, Public Defender, of Waukegan (Michael J. Boyd, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel), for appellant.

Jack Hoogasian, State's Attorney, of Waukegan (James W. Jerz, of Model District State's Attorneys Office, of counsel), for the People.


Abstract of Decision


Summaries of

People v. Peacock

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District
Jun 26, 1974
313 N.E.2d 470 (Ill. App. Ct. 1974)

In People v. Peacock (1974), 20 Ill. App.3d 969, 313 N.E.2d 470 (abstract), the defendant argued that the circumstantial evidence failed to prove that he was one of two persons observed during the burglary of a home.

Summary of this case from People v. Hancock
Case details for

People v. Peacock

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. F. ROBERT…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District

Date published: Jun 26, 1974

Citations

313 N.E.2d 470 (Ill. App. Ct. 1974)
313 N.E.2d 470

Citing Cases

People v. McDonald

We therefore find that the prosecutrix's in-court identification did have an origin independent of the lineup…

People v. Hancock

People v. Amos (1977), 46 Ill. App.3d 899, 901, 361 N.E.2d 861, 863. In People v. Peacock (1974), 20 Ill.…