From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Paulino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jun 27, 2019
173 A.D.3d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

9753 Index 260045/18 Ind. 352/17

06-27-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Robert PAULINO, Defendant. Franklyn Paulino Castillo, et al., Nonparty Appellants.

Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, New York (Sabrina Baig of counsel), for appellants. Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Felicia Yancey of counsel), for respondent.


Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, New York (Sabrina Baig of counsel), for appellants.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Felicia Yancey of counsel), for respondent.

Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Webber, Oing, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert E. Torres, J.), entered April 16, 2018, which denied appellants' application for remission of a bail forfeiture in the amount of $ 25,000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellants lacked standing to seek remission (see Matter of Van Deusen v. People, 97 A.D.2d 924, 470 N.Y.S.2d 770 [3d Dept. 1983], appeal dismissed 62 N.Y.2d 605, 479 N.Y.S.2d 1026, 467 N.E.2d 895 [1984] ), and, in any event, they did not show exceptional circumstances warranting the relief sought (see People v. Cotto, 262 A.D.2d 138, 693 N.Y.S.2d 98 [1st Dept. 1999] ).


Summaries of

People v. Paulino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jun 27, 2019
173 A.D.3d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Paulino

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Robert…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 27, 2019

Citations

173 A.D.3d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 5203
101 N.Y.S.3d 592