From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Paul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1985
114 A.D.2d 426 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

October 15, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.).


Judgment affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

We have reviewed the record and are satisfied that the proof of defendant's guilt, while based entirely on circumstantial evidence, flowed naturally from and was consistent with the facts proved, and excluded "`to a moral certainty' every reasonable hypothesis of innocence" (People v Benzinger, 36 N.Y.2d 29, 32, quoting from People v Borrero, 26 N.Y.2d 430, 435; see also, People v Sims, 110 A.D.2d 214).

Defendant's other contentions have been considered and have been found to be either without merit or unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law and we see no basis to review them as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice. Brown, J.P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Paul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1985
114 A.D.2d 426 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Paul

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALOYSIUS PAUL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 15, 1985

Citations

114 A.D.2d 426 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Stuart

most favorable to the prosecution (see, e.g., People v Malizia, 62 N.Y.2d 755, 757, cert denied 469 U.S.…

People v. DiBlasi

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. On appeal the defendant contends that the circumstantial evidence,…