From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Paul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 5, 1992
184 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

June 5, 1992

Appeal from the Ontario County Court, Reed, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Callahan, Balio and Lawton, JJ.


Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals, judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon remittitur of this case from the Court of Appeals, we consider those contentions previously raised by defendant but not decided by us (see, People v. Paul, 174 A.D.2d 996, revd 79 N.Y.2d 970). We conclude that the verdict finding defendant guilty of third degree sexual abuse is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence (People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495). Further, the court did not err in denying a hearing on defendant's claim of prosecutorial misconduct. There was no showing that the victim had been told not to speak with defendant's investigator, and we cannot conclude that the prosecutor interfered with defendant's pretrial investigation.


Summaries of

People v. Paul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 5, 1992
184 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Paul

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS E. PAUL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 5, 1992

Citations

184 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
584 N.Y.S.2d 236