From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Patterson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 2007
40 A.D.3d 659 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2005-03379.

May 1, 2007.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered March 21, 2005, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Katheryne M. Martone of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Karen F. McGee of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Krausman, Skelos and Dicker son, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the Supreme Court erred in failing to require the prosecution to provide a race-neutral explanation for a peremptory challenge to a black potential juror exercised during the first round of voir dire ( see People v James, 99 NY2d 264; People v Figueroa, 276 AD2d 561; People v Caston, 239 AD2d 355; People v Font, 223 AD2d 600).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).


Summaries of

People v. Patterson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 2007
40 A.D.3d 659 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

People v. Patterson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEVIN PATTERSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 2007

Citations

40 A.D.3d 659 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 3947
833 N.Y.S.2d 411

Citing Cases

People v. Wood

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the prosecutor offered a…

People v. Ramos

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. Contrary to the People's…