From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Patten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 22, 1996
232 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

October 22, 1996.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered September 30, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4½ to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Before: Rosenberger, J. P., Kupferman, Nardelli, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Defendant's request for a missing witness charge, made after both sides rested, was untimely ( People v White, 222 AD2d 209). In any event, defendant failed to meet his initial burden to support such a charge by demonstrating that the witnesses had any material knowledge ( People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 427).

The handwritten notes of the police chemist, even if arguably a business record, were nothing more than evidence cumulative of her testimony, and, as such, were properly excluded in the court's discretion ( People v Inniss, 83 NY2d 653, 658). "We have considered defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Patten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 22, 1996
232 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Patten

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TONY PATTEN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 22, 1996

Citations

232 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
649 N.Y.S.2d 9

Citing Cases

People v. St. Fleur

Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not…

People v. McGill

Contrary to defendant's contention, the credited testimony established that defendant's attack was not…