From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Patinha

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 31, 1992
188 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 31, 1992

Appeal from the County Court of Broome County (Monserrate, J.).


Defendant's only contention on this appeal is that his sentence of 3 1/3 to 10 years' imprisonment was harsh and excessive. Defendant pleaded guilty knowing that he would receive the sentence imposed by County Court. Further, as part of the plea bargain a second indictment pending against defendant was dismissed. In light of these facts, as well as the fact that the sentence was not the harshest possible, we find no basis to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court (see, People v Mackey, 136 A.D.2d 780, lv denied 71 N.Y.2d 899).

Mikoll, J.P., Yesawich Jr., Crew III, Mahoney and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Patinha

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 31, 1992
188 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Patinha

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANK J. PATINHA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
592 N.Y.S.2d 102