From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Parks

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 24, 2019
168 A.D.3d 585 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

8207 Ind. 633/11

01-24-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lloyd PARKS, Defendant–Appellant.

Justine M. Luongo, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Steven R. Berko of counsel), for appellant. Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Kyle R. Silverstein of counsel), for respondent.


Justine M. Luongo, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Steven R. Berko of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Kyle R. Silverstein of counsel), for respondent.

Sweeny, J.P., Tom, Kahn, Oing, Singh, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia A. Williams, J.), rendered October 25, 2013, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of two years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's legal sufficiency claim is unpreserved, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. We also find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson , 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). The evidence supported the inference that defendant's conduct after he exerted forcible compulsion constituted "sexual contact" ( Penal Law 130.00[3] ). We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining arguments.


Summaries of

People v. Parks

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 24, 2019
168 A.D.3d 585 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Parks

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lloyd Parks…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 24, 2019

Citations

168 A.D.3d 585 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 539
90 N.Y.S.3d 528

Citing Cases

Salazar v. The City of New York

A pleading that asserts the applicability of the affirmative negligence exception to the prior written notice…