From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Parker, King, Thomas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 20, 1994
205 A.D.2d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

June 20, 1994

Appeal from the County Court, Dutchess County (Berry, J.).


Ordered that the matter is remitted to the County Court, Dutchess County, to report its findings of fact in accordance with CPL 710.60 (4), and the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim. The County Court shall file its report with all convenient speed.

In granting those branches of the defendants' omnibus motions which were to suppress physical evidence, the court determined that the police officers' observations did not fall within the plain view exception to the warrant requirement. However, the court failed to make express findings of fact as required by CPL 710.60 (4) and (6) as to its determination of the credibility of the police witnesses. We therefore remit this matter to the County Court so that it may state the findings of fact essential to its determination (see, People v. Tirado, 69 N.Y.2d 863; People v. Rumph, 190 A.D.2d 698). Miller, J.P., O'Brien, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Parker, King, Thomas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 20, 1994
205 A.D.2d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Parker, King, Thomas

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. DAVID PARKER, KEVIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 20, 1994

Citations

205 A.D.2d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 312

Citing Cases

People v. Neely

A review of the cases reveals that when the Appellate Division remits a suppression issue to a court that has…

People v. Marion

Whether this contention has merit depends, in part, on the credibility of the police witnesses who testified…