Opinion
November 14, 1941.
Present — Martin, P.J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Martin, P.J., dissents and votes to reverse.
In view of the testimony that defendant failed to utilize available devices that would diminish the amount of noise emanating from the premises, so that it would not constitute a nuisance, the trial court was justified in finding the defendant guilty, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.