From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Parker

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 16, 2017
151 A.D.3d 1876 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

06-16-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Durval W. PARKER, Defendant–Appellant.

The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Timothy P. Murphy of Counsel), for defendant-appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Hannah Stith Long of Counsel), for respondent.


The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Timothy P. Murphy of Counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Hannah Stith Long of Counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16[12] ). Defendant's sole contention is that, under CPL 20.40 and the New York Constitution, the Erie County grand jury lacked authority and jurisdiction to indict him for the crime committed in Niagara County to which he pleaded guilty. We conclude that defendant's contention is foreclosed by his valid waiver of the right to appeal (see generally People v. Muniz, 91 N.Y.2d 570, 573–574, 673 N.Y.S.2d 358, 696 N.E.2d 182 ). Although defendant contends that the waiver does not encompass his challenge to the geographic jurisdiction of the grand jury inasmuch as that issue was not specifically mentioned during the waiver colloquy, the court "need not expressly delineate for a defendant those appellate issues that are foreclosed by a waiver of the right to appeal, and those that survive, in order for the court to obtain a valid appeal waiver" (People v. Nickell, 49 A.D.3d 1024, 1025, 853 N.Y.S.2d 432 ). We note, in any event, that defendant's challenge to geographical jurisdiction in Erie County is foreclosed by his guilty plea (see People v. Hand, 140 A.D.3d 636, 637, 34 N.Y.S.3d 54, lv. denied 28 N.Y.3d 971, 43 N.Y.S.3d 258, 66 N.E.3d 4 ).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, DeJOSEPH, CURRAN, and WINSLOW, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Parker

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 16, 2017
151 A.D.3d 1876 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Durval W. PARKER…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 16, 2017

Citations

151 A.D.3d 1876 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
151 A.D.3d 1876

Citing Cases

People v. Giles

That assertion lacks merit. The record establishes that the court, following the model colloquy, explained…

People v. Giles

That assertion lacks merit. The record establishes that the court, following the model colloquy, explained…