From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Parker

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Aug 26, 1921
54 Cal.App. 101 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)

Opinion

Crim. No. 949.

August 26, 1921.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. Lincoln S. Church, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

L. Gonsalves and Victor A. Dunn for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and John H. Riordan, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.


Defendant was convicted by a jury of the offense designated "pimping" in an act approved February 8, 1911, and found in Statutes of 1911 at page 10. He moved for a new trial, which motion was denied, as was also his motion for probation, after the filing of the report of the probation officer thereon. From the judgment of the court rendered herein the defendant appeals. The appeal is based solely upon the claim of insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. No useful purpose would be served by a review of the evidence in this opinion. [1] The evidence is ample to support the verdict, and we think no other verdict could have been reached by the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Nourse, J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.


Summaries of

People v. Parker

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Aug 26, 1921
54 Cal.App. 101 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
Case details for

People v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. WILLIAM H. PARKER, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two

Date published: Aug 26, 1921

Citations

54 Cal.App. 101 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
200 P. 293