From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Parker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 27, 1993
193 A.D.2d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 27, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (John P. Collins, J.).


Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People and giving them the benefit of every reasonable inference (People v Malizia, 62 N.Y.2d 755, cert denied 469 U.S. 932), we find that the evidence was sufficient as a matter of law to support the verdict finding defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of attempted murder in the second degree. Contrary to defendant's contention, the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it closed the courtroom to four of appellant's friends, during the testimony of a witness, who had reported their attempt to intimidate him (People v Guzman, 176 A.D.2d 561, 563, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 920).

We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Parker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 27, 1993
193 A.D.2d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY PARKER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 27, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
598 N.Y.S.2d 214

Citing Cases

People v. Hok Ming Chan

It has repeatedly been held that a threat to harm a witness justifies closing the courtroom during that…

People v. Montgomery

We also find that evidence of prior uncharged crimes was properly admissible as relevant to defendant's…