From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pantoja

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 2, 2011
87 A.D.3d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-08-2

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Rafael PANTOJA, appellant.


Diane E. Selker, Peekskill, N.Y., for appellant, and appellant pro se.Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Richard Longworth Hecht and Anthony J. Servino of counsel; Justin L. Tolbert on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Hubert, J.), rendered March 14, 2008, convicting him of grand larceny in the first degree and grand larceny in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, in which he moves to be relieved as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted ( see Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493; People v. Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631, 387 N.Y.S.2d 399; cf. People v. Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606, 419 N.Y.S.2d 913, 393 N.E.2d 987).

The defendant has not raised, nor could he have raised, any nonfrivolous issues in his pro se supplemental brief.


Summaries of

People v. Pantoja

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 2, 2011
87 A.D.3d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Pantoja

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Rafael PANTOJA, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 2, 2011

Citations

87 A.D.3d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
927 N.Y.S.2d 789
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 6144