From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pantoja

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 2, 2011
87 A.D.3d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2008-06237.

Decided on August 2, 2011.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Hubert, J.), rendered March 14, 2008, convicting him of grand larceny in the first degree and grand larceny in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California ( 386 US 738), in which he moves to be relieved as counsel for the appellant.

Diane E. Selker, Peekskill, N.Y., for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Richard Longworth Hecht and Anthony J.

Servino of counsel; Justin L. Tolbert on the brief), for respondent.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Belen, Hall and Roman, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted ( see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The defendant has not raised, nor could he have raised, any nonfrivolous issues in his pro se supplemental brief.


Summaries of

People v. Pantoja

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 2, 2011
87 A.D.3d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Pantoja

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAFAEL PANTOJA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 2, 2011

Citations

87 A.D.3d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 6144
927 N.Y.S.2d 789