From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Panay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 23, 1990
157 A.D.2d 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

January 23, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Collins, J.).


We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or excessive. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction", we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and, "[h]aving received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms." (People v. Felman, 141 A.D.2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 918.)

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ross, Milonas, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Panay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 23, 1990
157 A.D.2d 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Panay

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAIME PANAY, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 23, 1990

Citations

157 A.D.2d 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
550 N.Y.S.2d 298