From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Palumino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1991
172 A.D.2d 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 1, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the verdict sheet submitted to the jury deprived him of a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law since he failed to object to its submission (see, People v. Martinez, 150 A.D.2d 612; People v Ribowsky, 156 A.D.2d 726) and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction, given the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt (see, People v Mathis, 150 A.D.2d 613; People v. McKenzie, 148 A.D.2d 472). Thompson, J.P., Eiber, Balletta and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Palumino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1991
172 A.D.2d 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Palumino

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES PALUMINO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

People v. Deacon

The defendant's contention that the verdict sheet submitted to the jury was not proper is not preserved for…