From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Palmer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 30, 2017
153 A.D.3d 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

08-30-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Wayne A. PALMER, appellant.

Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Michael J. Brennan of counsel), for respondent.


Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Michael J. Brennan of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Camacho, J.), imposed June 17, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 339–342, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256–257, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ). The defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d at 255–256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ).

ENG, P.J., HALL, SGROI, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Palmer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 30, 2017
153 A.D.3d 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Wayne A. PALMER, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 30, 2017

Citations

153 A.D.3d 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
58 N.Y.S.3d 866