From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Palencia

Court of Appeals of New York.
Jun 23, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 4977 (N.Y. 2016)

Opinion

06-23-2016

The PEOPLE & c., Appellant, v. Carlos PALENCIA, Respondent.

Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola (Donald Berk of counsel), for appellant. Russell Law Group, PLLC, Westbury (Camille O. Russell of counsel), for respondent.


Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola (Donald Berk of counsel), for appellant.

Russell Law Group, PLLC, Westbury (Camille O. Russell of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 ), appeal dismissed upon the ground that the reversal by the Appellate Division was not “on the law alone or upon the law and such facts, which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal” (CPL 450.90[2][a] ). Chief Judge DiFIORE and Judges PIGOTT, RIVERA, ABDUS–SALAAM, STEIN, FAHEY and GARCIA concur.


Summaries of

People v. Palencia

Court of Appeals of New York.
Jun 23, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 4977 (N.Y. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Palencia

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE & c., Appellant, v. Carlos PALENCIA, Respondent.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Jun 23, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 4977 (N.Y. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 4977
36 N.Y.S.3d 88
55 N.E.3d 1061

Citing Cases

People v. Hui Chen

In support, the People cite to statutory authority mandating the admission of evidence regarding a…

People v. Hernandez

A comparison to narcotics field tests and PBT devices, as suggested by the defendant (Defendant's memorandum…